Classic Airframes 1/48 CR.32 advice

mike_espo · Post by **mike_espo** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:31 pm

I have not built a biplane kit in 25+ years. I have got to a critical part of assembly.

I have built the cockpit (splendid!) and closed up the fuselage halves and attached the lower wings. Primed the kit and fixed a few minor gaps with putty and super glue. Cleaned and finished all other parts and sub assemblies.

Now the hard part: Attaching the upper wing and the undercarriage.

I am embarrased to say I am unsure how to proceed: should I pre paint the interplane, cabine struts and undercarriage legs before I attach them to the wing and fuselage? or should I pre paint these, then paint the fuselage and wings then attach them?

I plan to build the pre-war version 1st Stormo, 1936 in natural and doped aluminium using Aclad II. Struts are black.

Any advice on how to attach the upper wing??

Thanks!

Post by **Editor** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:20 pm

Here's a pic from an upcoming Feature article by Davide Splendore that I think addresses your question:

mike_espo · Post by **mike_espo** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:09 pm

Wow!

Beautiful Photo.

Would like to see a writeup of the build.

Post by **Editor** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:51 pm

The article is coming.

Chris Busbridge · Post by **Chris Busbridge** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:49 am

One critical thing to do is to check the dihedral of the upper wing before attaching it.

On the model I built, the upper wing had a distinct upward curve on each side, which is clearly wrong. I flattened it out, after dipping it in 'very hot' water, by placing it upside down on a flat surface. The central bullet fairing stopped it from being completely flattended, as it should still have a very slight dihedral.

Doing this will make it much easier to attach!

mike_espo · Post by **mike_espo** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:37 am

yep. did that already. My sample had excessive dihedral also.

Capitano · Post by **Capitano** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 8:50 pm

Webmaster wrote:The article is coming.

Is that this:

http://www.stormomagazine.com/ModelArti ... VT_1a.html

Very nice either way.

Post by **Editor** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:31 am

No it was this article in three parts :

http://www.stormomagazine.com/ModelArti ... DS_1a.html

Capitano · Post by **Capitano** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:52 pm

Webmaster wrote:No it was this article in three parts :

http://www.stormomagazine.com/ModelArti ... DS_1a.html

Ah, yes, I've looked at that article a dozen times or more.