ANR Bf-109 G-14 Purple 1 Camo question.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2023 10:57 pm
Hello all.
I'm almost ready to begin painting my ANR Bf-109 G-14 purple 1 of 1 sq., 1 Groupo Caccia.
This is the often depicted aircraft with the fuselage over spray of the previous German marking.
In Camouflage and Markings of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana (D'Amico and Valentini) it is found on page 75.
In Bf 109 Late Versions Camouflage and Markings (Wolowski) it is on page 52
D'Amico and Valentini state it is RLM 81/82/76
Wolowski states RLM 82/75/76
I'm not sure which way to go. Looking at the plane, the camo along the fuselage spine is very low contrast from one another (red arrow in attached scan) whereas the engine cowling appears lighter (blue arrow). I don't think this can be due to the sun as it doesn't appear too bright and the mottling on the sides is also dark. Also, if you look at the fuselage sides, they appear slightly darker than the engine.
Could this late war aircraft had 82/75/76 cowling and 81/82/84 fuselage?
I'm interested to see read your opinions.
Thanks
Mike
I'm almost ready to begin painting my ANR Bf-109 G-14 purple 1 of 1 sq., 1 Groupo Caccia.
This is the often depicted aircraft with the fuselage over spray of the previous German marking.
In Camouflage and Markings of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana (D'Amico and Valentini) it is found on page 75.
In Bf 109 Late Versions Camouflage and Markings (Wolowski) it is on page 52
D'Amico and Valentini state it is RLM 81/82/76
Wolowski states RLM 82/75/76
I'm not sure which way to go. Looking at the plane, the camo along the fuselage spine is very low contrast from one another (red arrow in attached scan) whereas the engine cowling appears lighter (blue arrow). I don't think this can be due to the sun as it doesn't appear too bright and the mottling on the sides is also dark. Also, if you look at the fuselage sides, they appear slightly darker than the engine.
Could this late war aircraft had 82/75/76 cowling and 81/82/84 fuselage?
I'm interested to see read your opinions.
Thanks
Mike